Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2018-12-04 02:52:20
Message-ID: 20181204025220.GP3423@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:17:25PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think we should mark it as Returned with Feedback then.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-12-04 03:10:37 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-12-04 02:38:47 Re: error message when subscription target is a partitioned table