Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups
Date: 2018-11-30 01:44:33
Message-ID: 20181130014433.GB2267@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:03:54AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks David for the input. I think that I will be able to finish
> wrapping and commit this stuff tomorrow.

And done. I kept the split into two commits for clarity as suggested by
Stephen, as bisect would actually complain only when using EXEC_BACKEND,
and only for the test suite of pg_verify_checksums.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 01:48:00 Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 01:36:43 pgsql: Switch pg_verify_checksums back to a blacklist