Re: Why do pg_upgrade's test use the serial schedule?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Why do pg_upgrade's test use the serial schedule?
Date: 2018-11-05 21:20:57
Message-ID: 20181105212057.ve6ql4bkyey5w7v2@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-11-05 16:10:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > ISTM we also should disable fsyncs for the postmaster instances. Wins
> > another ~5s on my laptop, and I suspect it makes a larger difference on
> > some of the buildfarm animals.
>
> Buildfarm did that long ago.

I don't think it did for pg_upgrade's test.sh?

POSTMASTER_OPTS="-F -c listen_addresses=\"$LISTEN_ADDRESSES\" -k \"$PGHOST\""
...
"$oldbindir"/pg_ctl start -l "$logdir/postmaster1.log" -o "$POSTMASTER_OPTS" -w

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-05 21:32:20 Re: Why do pg_upgrade's test use the serial schedule?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-11-05 21:17:53 Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE