|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|To:||Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana(dot)Narlapuram(at)microsoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] Client Connection redirection support for PostgreSQL|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> However it would be far better to have a startup parameter which indicated
> that we wanted to connect to a read only database. At that point
> pools could redirect to a secondary. Given the proliferation of cloud based
> implementations I can see this being a useful feature.
The thread has died here... Without any input from the author for many
months. So I am marking it as returned with feedback.
|Next Message||Amit Kapila||2018-10-02 03:42:59||Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2018-10-02 02:58:41||Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation|