Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yuto Hayamizu <y(dot)hayamizu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation
Date: 2018-10-02 02:58:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 02:19:27PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> [ removal of latest arguments ]
> +1, if we could do that.

The patch seems to have stuck a bit, so I am marking it as returned with
feedback because of no activity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 03:00:51 Re: [HACKERS] Client Connection redirection support for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 02:56:19 Re: inconsistency and inefficiency in setup_conversion()