Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal
Date: 2018-09-30 12:40:31
Message-ID: 20180930124031.GA1763@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:58:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Actually, what you are proposing here sounds much better to me. That's
> in the area of what has been done recently with RemoveTempXlogFiles() in
> 5fc1008e. Any objections to doing something like that?

Okay. I have hacked a patch based on Stephen's idea as attached. Any
opinions?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
archive-missing-v1.patch text/x-diff 4.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-30 12:45:10 Re: automatic restore point
Previous Message John Naylor 2018-09-30 09:32:53 Sync ECPG scanner with core