| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq stricter integer parsing |
| Date: | 2018-09-11 09:00:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20180911090002.GB31650@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:01:15AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Hmmm. This is what the sentence following the above tries to explain
> implicitely:
>
> Versions of <application>libpq</application> before
> <product>PostgreSQL 12</product> accepted trailing garbage or overflows.
>
> Maybe I can rephrase it in one sentence, eg:
>
> "From PostgreSQL 12, integer values for keywords ... are parsed strictly,
> i.e. trailing garbage and errors on overflows are not accepted
> anymore."
Okay, I am including that formulation. I have not put yet much thoughts
into locating this in another place of the docs. Or perhaps we could
just discard it from the final commit.
I have been reviewing your patch a bit more, and I have found an issue:
overflows are not correctly detected. For example by specifying
something like port=5000000000 I would have expected an error but the
parsing code failed to detect that. Values like -1 need to be accepted
though are equivalent to an unknown state when it comes to keepalive_*.
In conclusion, I finish with the simplified patch attached. Fabien, is
that acceptable to you?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| libpq-int-parse.patch | text/x-diff | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2018-09-11 09:20:41 | Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on |
| Previous Message | Marina Polyakova | 2018-09-11 08:44:30 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |