Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date: 2018-05-10 19:45:12
Message-ID: 20180510194512.vg3zfwgouxfr3esj@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm thinking something like this.

The examples for runtime pruning are lame -- in the first, the text says
"watch out for Subplans Removed" and then the example provided doesn't
show one. (That example is probably exercising the wrong thing.)

Anyway, wording suggestions for 5.10.4 and 5.10.5 in the attached file
are welcome.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
ddl-partitioning.html text/html 52.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-05-10 20:05:04 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-05-10 19:38:34 Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4