| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
| Cc: | david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Date: | 2018-03-30 02:27:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20180330.112748.15673531.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:51:45 -0700, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in <20180330015145(dot)pvsr6kjtf6tw4uwe(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de>
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-03-30 10:35:48 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > 0002-0004 is new, in response to the comment that caches other
> > than the catcache ought to get the same feature. These can be a
> > separate development from 0001 for v12. I don't find a measures
> > to catch the all case at once.
> >
> > If we agree on the point. I wish to discuss only 0001 for v11.
>
> I'd personally not want to commit a solution for catcaches without also
> commiting a solution for a least relcaches in the same release cycle. I
> think this patch simply has missed the window for v11.
Ok. Agreed. I moved this to the next CF.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-30 02:37:19 | Re: Change RangeVarGetRelidExtended() to take flags argument? |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-03-30 02:19:58 | Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery |