Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication
Date: 2018-03-14 19:15:52
Message-ID: 20180314191552.dbjkn3o5gfkgdpfa@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Yeah, seems a reasonable idea to me. Here's a tidied-up version of your
> patch, minus the regression test changes (I may end up committing that
> one separately).

... and patch.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-logical-replication-change-how-datatype-mapping-is-u.patch text/plain 10.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-14 19:33:50 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2018-03-14 19:10:27 Re: Ambigous Plan - Larger Table on Hash Side