Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date: 2018-01-04 16:37:08
Message-ID: 20180104163708.bzgheqsny6tsatzf@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I tried this patch (applying it on Amit's last current version on top of
4e2970f8807f which is the latest it applies to) and regression tests
fail with the attached diff; in all cases it appears to be an off-by-one
in row count. Would you please give it a look?

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
regression.diffs text/plain 4.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-01-04 16:39:40 Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-04 16:28:23 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning