Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2017-11-30 20:47:56
Message-ID: 20171130204755.GA13027@arthur.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:39:56AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> So is it now the case that all of the regression test cases in this
> patch produce the same results as they would on Oracle?
>

Yes, exactly. All new cases give the same result as in Oracle, except
text of error messages.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-11-30 20:50:08 Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-30 20:39:50 Re: ASCII Null control character validation