Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar stream for backup_label

From: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar stream for backup_label
Date: 2017-03-31 15:35:45
Message-ID: 20170331153544.GA9286@nighthawk.caipicrew.dd-dns.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:37:38 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqQU1H=PAG3XBYFFg9w+emeQFYAdkep7cWVeJukXtB_m_Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > In my first reviews of the patch, I completely forgot the fact that
> > BASE_BACKUP does send the start LSN of the backup in the first result
> > set, so the patch proposed is actually rather useless because the data
> > you are looking for is already at hand. If more data would be
> > interesting to have, like the start timestamp number, we could just
> > extend the first result set a bit as Fujii-san is coming at. Let's
> > drop this patch and move on.
>
> +1 for dropping this.

I've marked it as "Rejected" now, as that is clearly the consensus.

> But I think we should edit the documentation a bit.
>
> I don't fully understand those who want to handle it by a script,
> but the documentation seems to be suggesting that something like
> is possible. So it might be better add a description like that or
> just remove the example.

The documentation says "For the purpose of testing replication
commands", one could use psql and "IDENTIFY_SYSTEM", it doesn't exactly
suggest to run BASE_BACKUP this way.

Which, by the way, appears to be working totally fine from psql, modulo
the problem that you won't get to the starting transaction location.

> "psql doesn't handle this protocol properly. The instances of the
> usage of these protocols are found in the source code of
> walreceiver and pg_basebackup."

Something along those lines makes sense I think, yeah.

Michael

--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de

credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-03-31 15:47:32 Re: postgres_fdw: support parameterized foreign joins
Previous Message Keith Fiske 2017-03-31 15:30:56 pg_partman 3.0.0 - real-world usage of native partitioning and a case for native default