|From:||Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>|
|To:||Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:49:33 +0100
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I did a review of this patch
I'm attaching new version of patch with the issues pointed by you fixed.
> 4. A documentation is good - although I am not sure if it is well
> structured - is <sect2> level necessary? Probably there will not be
> any other similar command.
Removed <sect2>. Although it is questionable - now there is no
subsection with name of the command in the title. But surrounding
section describes only one command,.
> 5. There are a basic regress tests, and all tests passed, but I miss a
> path, where subtransaction is commited - now rollback is every time
Added test with successful subtransaction commit. Just to be sure it is
> 6. The code has some issues with white chars
Fixed where I've found it. Now, hopefully my code uses same identation
rules as other pltcl.c
> 7. I don't understand why TopMemoryContext is used there? Maybe some
> already used context should be there.
It turns out that was really an error in the first version of patch.
This context manipulation was copied from PL/Python context manager by
PL/Python changes to TopTransactionContext in order to manage
stack of subtransaction data (which we don't need in Tcl, because we
can use C language stack and store neccessary data in function
automatic variables. Really python doesn't need this stack to, because
Python context manager is a python language object and can keep state
Although we still need to keep MemoryContext and ResourceOwner and
restore them upon transaction finish.
With best regards, Victor
Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
|Next Message||Pavel Stehule||2017-03-09 08:25:14||Re: Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl|
|Previous Message||Ashutosh Bapat||2017-03-09 06:23:17||Re: foreign partition DDL regression tests|