Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Date: 2016-12-27 08:25:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:02:11 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSsBzhOkCXyBh9_ZGUEnr0HCKRcpC9DMk6VVCGBez1pzA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-22 08:32:56 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> I plan to commit this later today. Hope I got the reviewers roughly right.
> >>
> >> And pushed. Thanks for the work on this everyone.
> >
> > Cool. Also, +1 for the important/unimportant terminology. I like that.
> Thanks for the commit.

Thanks for commiting.

By the way this issue seems beeing in the ToDo list.

> Consider avoiding WAL switching via archive_timeout if there
> has been no database activity
> - archive_timeout behavior for no activity
> - Re: archive_timeout behavior for no activity

So I marked it as "done".


Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-12-27 08:59:05 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-12-27 08:12:36 Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.