Non-empty default log_line_prefix

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date: 2016-10-02 20:20:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Tom Lane 2016-09-29 <18642(dot)1475159736(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > Possibly the longer version could be added as an example in the
> > documentation.
> I suspect that simply having a nonempty default in the first place
> is going to do more to raise peoples' awareness than anything we
> could do in the documentation. But perhaps an example along these
> lines would be useful for showing proper use of %q.

Patch attached. (Still using %t, I don't think %m makes sense for the


Attachment Content-Type Size
log_line_prefix text/plain 2.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-02 21:59:47 Re: pg_upgade vs config
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-10-02 19:48:47 Re: pg_upgade vs config