| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: anyone using oid2name? |
| Date: | 2014-12-12 14:48:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20141212144822.GB19833@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:42:48AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/12/14 9:25 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:18:53AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> pgsql-hackers are discussing some housekeeping in contrib.
> >>
> >> Is anyone using the oid2name tool?
> >>
> >> Otherwise, we might deprecate and eventually remove it.
> >
> > Uh, if we remove it, what tool does someone use from the command-line to
> > find the objects represented by files?
>
> I don't know. I want to find out what people are using it for.
>
> One option would be to tweak some psql backslash commands to show the
> information. Most of the functionality is already there.
True. It might be possible to just document a psql -c command to do it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Begin | 2014-12-12 15:57:21 | Re: Removing duplicate records from a bulk upload (rationale behind selecting a method) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-12-12 14:42:48 | Re: anyone using oid2name? |