| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |
| Date: | 2018-02-09 18:33:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20134.1518201188@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Me neither. I just ran the postgres_fdw regression tests 713 times in
> a row without a failure. Tom, since you seem to be able to reproduce
> the problem locally, could you have a look at this proposed fix?
I'm a bit busy, but AFAICS it's just a timing thing, so try inserting
a sleep. The attached is enough to reproduce rhinoceros' results
for me.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| add-sleep.patch | text/x-diff | 653 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-02-09 18:58:35 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-09 16:50:14 | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |