Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
Date: 2018-02-09 18:33:08
Message-ID: 20134.1518201188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Me neither. I just ran the postgres_fdw regression tests 713 times in
> a row without a failure. Tom, since you seem to be able to reproduce
> the problem locally, could you have a look at this proposed fix?

I'm a bit busy, but AFAICS it's just a timing thing, so try inserting
a sleep. The attached is enough to reproduce rhinoceros' results
for me.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
add-sleep.patch text/x-diff 653 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-02-09 18:58:35 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-02-09 16:50:14 Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly