| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples |
| Date: | 2013-01-29 03:28:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20130129032859.GA24443@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:12:33PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 23 January 2013 04:35, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Also, perhaps we should
> >> consider Simon's one-liner fix for backpatching this instead of the
> >> original patch you posted?
> >
> > I have no nontrivial preference between the two approaches.
>
> Sorry, I didn't see this. I guess you saw I applied my one liner and
> backpatched it.
Yes; thanks.
> I'm expecting to apply Noah's larger patch to HEAD with the suggested
> edits. I'll do that last thing in the CF.
What "suggested edits" do you have in mind?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-29 03:35:22 | Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-29 03:23:57 | Re: Hm, table constraints aren't so unique as all that |