Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>,Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-16 20:45:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:13:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think a realistic answer might be to admit that we've slipped quite a
> bit.  Set the end date of CF3 to perhaps end of January, do triage the
> first week of February, and then start CF4 after that, about three or
> four weeks later than planned.

This makes sense.  Things have just not worked out as planned and we
should adjust.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-16 20:13:50 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2013-01-16 21:06:51
Subject: Re: Parallel query execution
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-16 20:13:50
Subject: Re: CF3+4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group