Re: CF3+4

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-16 20:45:46
Message-ID: 20130116204546.GA6719@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:13:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think a realistic answer might be to admit that we've slipped quite a
> bit. Set the end date of CF3 to perhaps end of January, do triage the
> first week of February, and then start CF4 after that, about three or
> four weeks later than planned.

This makes sense. Things have just not worked out as planned and we
should adjust.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-16 20:13:50 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-01-16 21:06:51 Re: Parallel query execution
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-01-16 20:13:50 Re: CF3+4