From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Parallel query execution |
Date: | 2013-01-16 13:38:08 |
Message-ID: | 20130116133808.GH16126@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> In case you hadn't noticed, we've totally lost control of the CF
> process.
I concur.
> Quite aside from the lack of progress on closing CF3, major
> hackers who should know better are submitting significant new feature
> patches now, despite our agreement in Ottawa that nothing big would be
> accepted after CF3.
For my small part, it wasn't my intent to drop a contentious patch at
the end. I had felt it was pretty minor and relatively simple. My
arguments regarding the popen patch were simply that it didn't address
one of the use-cases that I was hoping to.
I'll hold off on working on the compressed transport for now in favor of
doing reviews and trying to help get 9.3 wrapped up.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-16 13:42:29 | Re: Parallel query execution |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-16 13:33:54 | Re: Parallel query execution |