Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ALTER command reworks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>,PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER command reworks
Date: 2013-01-15 15:06:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai escribió:

> The attached patch is a rebased version towards the latest master
> branch, and fix up the issue around error messages on name conflicts.

I assume the lock.c changes are just a bollixed merge, right?

I am not sure about some of the changes in the regression test expected
output; are we really okay with losing the "in schema foo" part in some
of these cases?

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-15 15:09:17
Subject: Re: strange OOM errors with EXECUTE in PL/pgSQL
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2013-01-15 14:56:08
Subject: Re: recent ALTER whatever .. SET SCHEMA refactoring

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group