Re: autovacuum truncate exclusive lock round two

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum truncate exclusive lock round two
Date: 2012-11-15 22:39:26
Message-ID: 20121115223926.GD14789@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Use this lmgr feature inside count_nondeletable_pages() of vacuumlazy.c to
> > periodically check, if there is a conflicting lock request waiting. If not,
> > keep going. If there is a waiter, truncate the relation to the point checked
> > thus far, release the AccessExclusiveLock, then loop back to where we
> > acquire this lock in the first place and continue checking/truncating.
>
> I think that maybe we could just bail out after releasing the
> AccessExclusiveLock and trust autovacuum to get back to truncating that
> relation later.

That doesn't work, because the truncating code is not reached unless
vacuuming actually took place. So if you interrupt it, it will just not
get called again later. Maybe we could have autovacuum somehow invoke
that separately, but that would require that the fact that truncation
was aborted is kept track of somewhere.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2012-11-15 23:31:33 Re: another idea for changing global configuration settings from SQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-15 22:38:47 Re: another idea for changing global configuration settings from SQL