Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: 'Robert Haas' <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Josh Berkus' <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Magnus Hagander' <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, 'Christopher Browne' <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
Date: 2012-11-08 14:36:32
Message-ID: 20121108143632.GA7225@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila escribió:

> 3. Two backends trying to write to .auto file
> we can use ".auto.lock" as the the lock by trying to create it in
> exclusive mode as the first step
> of the command. If it already exists then backend needs to wait.

So changing .auto settings would be nontransactional? The other way to
define this would be to have a lock that you grab and keep until end of
transaction, and the .auto.lock file is deleted if the transaction is
aborted; so have the .auto.lock -> .auto rename only happen at
transaction commit.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2012-11-08 14:38:46 Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-11-08 14:26:27 Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL