Re: Have we out-grown Flex?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Have we out-grown Flex?
Date: 2012-05-02 18:15:46
Message-ID: 20120502181546.GC21098@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:37:58AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I could try to clean up and post the patch that implements this if you want.
>
> The second method was just to do --enable-profiling on a stock build
> and look at the call graph section of gprof output. It attributed 50%
> to pg_plan_queries and children and about 10% to each of
> pg_parse_query and pg_analyze_and_rewrite (including their respective
> children). I don't put tremendous faith in gprof's call graph, but
> the fact that the results are in agreement with the other method gives
> me more confidence in both.

Those are the ratio's I (and I think Tom) expected to see.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-02 18:17:38 Beta time?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-05-02 18:14:31 Re: online debloatification (was: extending relations more efficiently)