| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication docs update |
| Date: | 2012-03-21 15:44:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20120321154438.GA17070@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Our chapter, "Comparison of Different Solutions", needs an update to use
> > our new streaming replication terminology, and an update to mention the
> > synchronous option.
> >
> > Patch attached. I would like to apply it to head and 9.1.
>
> Is it really a good idea to remove the name "hot standby" where you've
> done so? It's a term that's pretty well set by now. Maybe instad "hot
> standby using transaction log replication" instead of taking it away
> completely?
Well, hot/warm standby is really a side-feature of replication, not a
replication technology itself. WAL streaming is a replication
technology. For example, Shared Disk Failover is technically a warm
standby too.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-03-21 16:06:27 | Re: Replication docs update |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-03-21 11:01:34 | Re: Replication docs update |