| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joey Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)surfar(dot)nu>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-01-31 18:29:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20120131182959.GA5577@toroid.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2012-01-31 12:04:31 -0500, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> That fails to answer the question of what we ought to do if we get an
> invalid sequence there.
I think it's best to categorically reject invalid surrogates as early as
possible, considering the number of bugs that are related to them (not
in Postgres, just in general). I can't see anything good coming from
letting them in and leaving them to surprise someone in future.
-- ams
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-01-31 18:32:31 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-01-31 18:17:25 | no error context for index updates? |