| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Date: | 2012-01-25 15:48:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20120125154834.GC25970@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 07:44:14AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > I thought that this is what I will achieve with extract(epoch from now()
> > at time zone 'UTC') but clearly it doesn't work.
> > So what options do I have?
>
> Isn't extract(epoch from now()) getting what you want?
you can't make index on it.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 16:06:42 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2012-01-25 15:48:13 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2012-01-25 15:53:45 | Re: GUC_REPORT for protocol tunables was: Re: Optimize binary serialization format of arrays with fixed size elements |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2012-01-25 15:48:13 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |