Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it>
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Date: 2011-12-14 22:19:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: psycopg
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:00:50 pm Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Marko, I've noted just now the "snafu" in the title: do you have
> anything to complain about? Please make an explicit list of your
> points because - but it may be just me not understanding the
> subtleties of the English language - I feel your tone in this thread a
> little bit on the unpleasant side.

From what I read Marko was pointing out that the symbolic codes to numeric codes 
relationship represents a mapping and that mapping works both ways. To help with 
backwards compatibility he was looking to retain the original meaning of the 
numeric codes as much as possible. It is a legitimate concern.

> -- Daniele,

Adrian Klaver

In response to

psycopg by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2011-12-14 23:42:28
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Previous:From: Daniele VarrazzoDate: 2011-12-14 22:00:50
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group