Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CREATE USER
Date: 2011-12-13 23:36:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I just notice that when you create a user using CREATE USER and give
> > the user the ability to create other users it gets created as
> Are you talking about the CREATEUSER option?  That is documented, quite
> clearly I think:
> 	These clauses are an obsolete, but still accepted, spelling of
> 	SUPERUSER and NOSUPERUSER. Note that they are not equivalent to
> 	CREATEROLE as one might naively expect!
> The only way we could really make this any better is to remove these
> keywords, which might be something to consider.  The preferred SUPERUSER
> spelling has been accepted since 8.1 ... is that long enough to ensure
> everyone's converted their client-side tools?  Probably not :-(

How does this relate to people restoring pre-8.1 pg_dumpall dumps? 
Seems removing this option would cause the restore to fail.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2011-12-14 00:12:07
Subject: Re: CREATE USER
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-12-13 20:11:39
Subject: Re: PDF Documentation Issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group