Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > On tis, 2011-11-29 at 16:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I have applied the attached patch to help make suggestsions for server
> >> developers. I didn't reproduce most of the text because it was already
> >> listed with the options. Let me know if you want additional text.
> > Advising "server developers" to use CFLAGS="-O0 -g", without
> > qualification, is dangerous, in my mind, because that loses a lot of
> > compiler checks. The only reason to use -O0 is when you really need to
> > debug something in single steps and you can't make sense of it any other
> > way.
> Yes. -O0 is really a pretty horrid default choice, and we should NOT be
> recommending it, especially not with no discussion of the disadvantages.
I have applied the attached patch to mention the debugger. OK?
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joe Abbate||Date: 2011-11-30 00:29:20|
|Subject: Reserved words and delimited identifiers|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-11-30 00:04:23|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation |