Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)freebsd(dot)org>, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation
Date: 2011-10-14 14:56:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2011/10/14 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> >> Should this be marked as TODO?
> > I suppose TODO items *are* wanted and so working on them should remove
> > the pain to convince people here to accept the feature, aren't they ?
> There is plenty of stuff in the TODO list for which there is no
> consensus.

Uh, we should probably remove those then.  Can you think of any?

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-10-14 15:05:02
Previous:From: Thomas GiraultDate: 2011-10-14 14:43:01
Subject: LIMITing number of results in a VIEW with global variables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group