| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for |
| Date: | 2011-09-06 21:19:02 |
| Message-ID: | 201109062119.p86LJ2F12257@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed. What question
> >> were you trying to answer?
>
> > It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> > invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> > other backends:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php
>
> Oh. OK, I cleaned it up a bit.
Thanks. Good to have it documented.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-06 21:32:56 | pgsql: Add documentation suggestion about adding a comment to the top o |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-06 21:07:56 | Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for |