On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
> it's really worth the trouble.
well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble. If I had datbaase
standing at 5432, it would connect to it, and then I could mistakenly
ran commands to wrong database.
this is clearly not a good thing.
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-06 15:35:43|
|Subject: Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-09-06 14:08:59|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5932: CLUSTER doesn't update n_dead_tup|