Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
> > > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
> > That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers....
> > Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer.
> Well, that has worked well for my case -- I haven't ever credited my
> employer, only those that have specifically hired us for a particular
> patch. My employer gets a lot of "credit" in the form of email
> signatures, like the one below ;-)
> But I see your point and I will stick to whatever policy we come up with
> (assuming we come up with one).
> > This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
> > messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
> > venue for the other credit.
> I'm open to ideas.
Agreed. I am not firm either way on the issue; I was just throwing out
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-07-12 14:20:59|
|Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-07-12 13:56:30|
|Subject: Re: per-column generic option|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-07-12 14:29:40|
|Subject: pgsql: perltidy run over msvc build system|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-07-12 13:54:34|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID|