Re: Major features for 9.1

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Date: 2011-04-07 00:39:33
Message-ID: 20110407003933.GA9129@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
> > I assume you mean by "innovation" that these are things where
> > PostgreSQL
> > was the first DBMS to implement them. The risk with that is, unless
> > you
> > do very careful research, someone might debunk each of these within 24
> > hours after the release, making the whole thing look foolish.
>
> Well, we can hedge a bit. But, better, can someone (preferably several someones) on this list volunteer to do research? Anyone?
>
> >
> > Moreover, the fact that something might have been innovated doesn't
> > explain how it helps the user.
>
> Truthfully, for a press release, it doesn't matter. Many reporters/bloggers will happily quote that we're the first database with SSI without having a clue what it means. In general, most reporters who cover databases don't really know know (or care) much about databases regardless (or "NoSQL" wouldn't have the press it does).
>
> >From a PR perspective, the important thing to get across is that the PostgreSQL project is innovating, implementing new database tech before anyone else. This is critically important during a period where SQL-RDBMSes are being portrayed as "old grandfathers" in a press more enchanted with "the new hotness" of recently invented DBMSes.
>
> Now, for our users and for serious database geeks, we *do* need an elevator-pitch explanation of several features which tells them why they should care. Several features in particular are not immediately obvious:
>
> * SSI
> * wCTE
> * KNN-GiST
> * SE-Postgres
> * Transaction-controlled Synch Rep
>
> I would like to have volunteers from the advocacy list commit to taking on one of each of these features. For each one we need:
>
> a) a two-line explanation of what the feature is and why it's valuable (for the release notes, etc.)
> b) a wiki page with a more detailed explaination and examples oriented towards the beginning-to-intermediate PostgreSQL user.

I'll take a whack at wCTE :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-04-07 00:41:35 Re: Major features for 9.1
Previous Message Roy Hann 2011-04-06 20:40:04 Re: Major features for 9.1