| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |
| Date: | 2011-04-01 21:52:49 |
| Message-ID: | 201104012152.p31LqnK22657@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think this should be left alone. As you said, it isn't worth it.
>
> Agreed it is not worth it but I think we should at least C comment
> something. I think at a minimum we should set it to
> FirstNormalTransactionId.
>
> I am not so concerned about this case but about other cases where we are
> computing xid distances across the invalid range.
Please ignore the patch I had attached. I realize it just moves the
problem around.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-04-01 21:59:40 | Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-04-01 21:48:16 | Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |