Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?
Date: 2011-04-01 21:52:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think this should be left alone.  As you said, it isn't worth it.
> Agreed it is not worth it but I think we should at least C comment
> something.   I think at a minimum we should set it to
> FirstNormalTransactionId.
> I am not so concerned about this case but about other cases where we are
> computing xid distances across the invalid range.

Please ignore the patch I had attached.  I realize it just moves the
problem around.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2011-04-01 21:59:40
Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-04-01 21:48:16
Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group