Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Naoya Anzai <anzai-naoya(at)mxu(dot)nes(dot)nec(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.
Date: 2011-04-01 04:56:29
Message-ID: 20110401045629.GA9314@tornado.gateway.2wire.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:11:49AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I think this is a manifestation the same problem mentioned here:
> >>
> >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=31b6fc06d83c6de3644c8f2921eb7de0eb92fac3
> >>
> >> I believe this requires some refactoring to fix. ?It would be good to do that.
> >
> > The best way I can see is to make ATExecAddColumn more like ATExecDropColumn,
> > ATAddCheckConstraint, and ATExecDropConstraint. ?Namely, recurse at Exec-time
> > rather than Prep-time, and cease recursing when we satisfy the ADD COLUMN with a
> > merge. ?Did you have something else in mind?
>
> I had exactly what you just said in mind.

Patch attached, then.

> > Incidentally, when we satisfy an ADD COLUMN with a merge, we do not check or
> > update attnotnull:
<details ... what should we do?>

> Not sure. I think that anything we do here is bound to have some
> corner cases that are not quite right for so long as NOT NULL
> constraints aren't represented in pg_constraint, and it's way too late
> to dredge up that issue again for 9.1. I'm somewhat inclined to just
> defer fixing it until we get that work committed.

OK.

Attachment Content-Type Size
attinhcount-merge-v1.patch text/plain 15.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-04-01 08:17:57 Re: default password for user postgres
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2011-04-01 03:49:20 Re: BUG #5939: About bytea

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2011-04-01 05:51:54 Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-04-01 03:12:27 Re: corner case about replication and shutdown