Re: updated patch for foreach stmt

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: updated patch for foreach stmt
Date: 2011-02-08 21:16:16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> There is only bad keywords in doc - SCALE instead SLICE and a maybe a
> usage of slicing need a example.

Err, yeah, a couple of stupid documentation issues, sorry about that.

commit 9460c0831f5de71e31823b7e9d8511d2d8124776
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:15:03 2011 -0500

Add ARRAY keyword to example, ewps.

commit 34a8ffd8d4cfe42bb4f698564f16bd468b9f2613
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:14:17 2011 -0500

Tabs are bad, mmmkay.

commit cf1ebcb7e4905cc31cd58b4fd9fa90cd488cc0c0
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:13:22 2011 -0500

PL/PgSQL documentation cleanups

SCALE -> SLICE (no clue where SCALE came from..) and clarify
what a SLICE is, really.



Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql_foreach_2011020803.patch text/x-diff 38.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-08 21:23:04 Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-08 21:12:34 Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)