Re: Spread checkpoint sync

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Date: 2011-02-01 18:30:53
Message-ID: 201102011830.p11IUrW19502@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> > I think the right way to compute "relations to sync" is to finish the
> > sorted writes patch I sent over a not quite right yet update to already
>
> Attached update now makes much more sense than the misguided patch I
> submitted two weesk ago. This takes the original sorted write code,
> first adjusting it so it only allocates the memory its tag structure is
> stored in once (in a kind of lazy way I can improve on right now). It
> then computes a bunch of derived statistics from a single walk of the
> sorted data on each pass through. Here's an example of what comes out:

In that patch, I would like to see a meta-comment explaining why the
sorting is happening and what we hope to gain.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-01 18:32:22 Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-01 18:30:34 Re: SSI patch version 14