| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups |
| Date: | 2011-01-11 22:11:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20110111221132.GC11603@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:06:34PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing
> > with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't
> > trust it to work when the chips were down.
>
> I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and Heikki, I think this will be a major usability improvement. It takes us from "there's a way to do that" to "it just works".
(It just works)++ :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2011-01-11 22:25:35 | arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-01-11 22:10:59 | Re: Something fishy about the current Makefiles |