Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Date: 2010-12-02 21:36:51
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 02 December 2010 22:21:37 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of sáb oct 30 05:49:21 -0300 2010:
> > Ill set this up for the next commitfest, I don't think I can do much
> > more without further input.
> Are you reserving about 20 bits for levels, and 12 for flags? Given the
> relatively scarce growth of levels, I think we could live with about 6
> or 7 bits for level, rest for flags.
The number I picked was absolutely arbitrary I admit. Neither did I think it
would be likely to see more levels, nor did I forsee many flags, so I just
chose some number I liked in that certain moment ;-)


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-02 22:00:18 Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-12-02 21:21:37 Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation