Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01.12.2010 03:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Let's recap what happens when a VM bit is set: You set the
> >> PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag on the heap page (assuming it's not set already, it
> >> usually isn't), and then set the bit in the VM while keeping the heap
> >> page locked.
> > What if we set PD_ALL_VISIBLE on the heap page, wait for a checkpoint to
> > happen so the heap page is guaranteed to be on disk, then on next read,
> > if PD_ALL_VISIBLE is set and the VM all-visible bit is not set, set the
> > VM bit.
> Hmm, you'd somehow have to know if a checkpoint has happened since the
> flag was set. And it might be a long wait, which makes it less
Well, doesn't the page LSN tell you that already?
> attractive for index-only scans.
My assumption is that this page will remain read-only for a while, so I
don't see the big downside in a delay of max 5-10 minutes. For sites
where pages go frequently in and out of read-only status, I don't think
index-only scans are every going to be a big win. Long-running queries
alone are going to delay how quickly we can set PD_ALL_VISIBLE, so I
don't see an additional 5-10 minutes as a big problem.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-12-01 13:41:59|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: First step towards Intelligent,integrated database|
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2010-12-01 13:11:25|
|Subject: Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)|