Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

From: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Date: 2010-10-14 18:40:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled
> there.  I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been
> involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same
> feature.  Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense
> to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.

In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in 
CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read 
classes) and about 50% it's big test case.

Have a nice day,

Attachment: statemnt_to_20101014.patch.gz
Description: application/x-gzip (8.9 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-14 18:50:26
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-10-14 18:34:54
Subject: Re: BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-10-14 21:57:37
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-10-14 17:25:13
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group