Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A note on pg_upgrade and missing ""

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A note on pg_upgrade and missing ""
Date: 2010-09-28 17:44:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Ian Barwick wrote:
> >> Well, that is step #4:
> >>
> >> ? ? ?
> >> ? ? ? 4.
> >>
> >> ? ? ? Install pg_upgrade
> >>
> >> ? ? ? Install pg_upgrade and pg_upgrade_support in the new PostgreSQL cluster
> >>
> >> Was that not clear enough?
> >
> > I hope my comment didn't sound insulting. ?I really want to know how
> > that doc item can be made clearer.
> No insult taken :) .With the benefit of hindsight it's plenty clear;
> the problem was:
> a) I was doing this in a hurry (had a small amount of time to kill and
> a dev machine with an older beta on it)
> b) got sidetracked by this thread which appears to describe the same
> problem:
> and which was popping up pretty high in Google.

Yep, we need to address this.

> Looking over the doc page again, if scanning over it, it's a bit easy
> to misread it as something like "Install pg_upgrade for pg_upgrade
> support in the new PostgreSQL cluster".

The big problem was that the title said "Install pg_upgrade", but the
detail had you installing two things, one of which was pg_upgrade.  It
was using pg_upgrade in both a generic sense, and in the
/contrib/pg_upgrade sense, which is bound to confuse, as you said.

I have attached a doc diff I backpatched to 9.0 that includes
pg_upgrade_support in the section title. This should avoid future
confusing.  Thanks for your report.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment: /rtmp/diff
Description: text/x-diff (417 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Larry LeszczynskiDate: 2010-09-28 17:46:34
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9 Mac OS X one-click install - PL/perl broken
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-28 16:54:03
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 large object permissions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group