From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> |
Cc: | pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade test |
Date: | 2010-08-15 18:36:04 |
Message-ID: | 201008151836.o7FIa4U23308@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-testers |
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> [TEST REPORT]
> [Release]: 9.0Beta4
> [Test Type]: Feature test
> [Test]: pg_upgrade
> [Platform]: Ubuntu 10.04 64bit
> [Parameters]: Default
> [Failure]: No
> [Results]: pg_upgrade successful
>
>
> I run the test on the 6 GB cluster consisting of 6 databases.
> The 'old style' test (pg_dumpall / pg_restore) took around 26 minutes.
> Doing `pg_dump -Fc f` for each database, then recreating databases and
> users on new (9.0b4) cluster, and then pg_restoring databases took 15
> minutes. (Too bad one can't pg_dumpall -Fc).
>
> Using pg_upgrade the migration took 5 minutes, including 'vacuumdb -aZ'.
> Great tool!
Great, thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-08-16 06:44:34 | Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4 |
Previous Message | Mario Splivalo | 2010-08-15 18:22:10 | pg_upgrade test |