Leonardo F wrote:
> I'm trying to find more docs that explain the "improvements" of
> bitmap indexes in other products... but most of what I've found
> talks about bitmapAND/OR.... which is something that is very
> cool, but that postgres already does even with btree indexes...
> or index creation time/size, which are, for the moment, the only
> things that I'm pretty confident the patch would actually provide.
I think a real limitation of on-disk bitmap indexes is that they are
only feable for low cardinality columns, while btree handles all column
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-07-02 02:44:48|
|Subject: Re: 9.0beta2 - server crash when using HS + SR|
|Previous:||From: uwcssa||Date: 2010-07-02 01:20:25|