Tom Lane wrote:
> So as far as I can tell, no one is opposed to replacing "expr AS name"
> with "name := expr" in the named-parameter syntax. Obviously we had
> better get this done before beta2. Is anyone actually working on the
> code/docs changes? If not, I'll pick it up.
If we eventually are going to want to support the ANSI standard "=>"
syntax, I am thinking we should just do it now. The larger question is
what justification do we have of not supporting "=>".
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-05-31 14:26:00|
|Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-05-31 14:14:06|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable|