Re: BUG #5469: regexp_matches() has poor behaviour and more poor documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5469: regexp_matches() has poor behaviour and more poor documentation
Date: 2010-05-31 14:11:44
Message-ID: 201005311411.o4VEBiQ11120@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I have updated the patch, attached, to clarify that this returns text
> > arrays, and that you can force it to always return one row using
> > COALESCE() and a '|' pattern (the later suggested by Daniele Varrazzo).
>
> I don't find this part to be something we should include in the
> documentation. If we want to include a workaround, how about defining
> a non-SRF that just calls the SRF and returns the first row?

Remember this has to return one row for no matches, so a simple SRF will
not work. I also have not seen enough demand for another function. A
single doc mention seemed the appropriate level of detail for this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 14:12:55 Re: BUG #5469: regexp_matches() has poor behaviour and more poor documentation
Previous Message Sachin Srivastava 2010-05-31 13:17:22 Re: BUG #5485: Microsoft VC++ exception during postgres instalation