Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: exporting raw parser

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: exporting raw parser
Date: 2010-05-27 03:01:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> My "stand-alone" means libSQL can be used from many modules
> without duplicated codes. For example, copy routines for raw
> parse trees should be in the DLL rather than in postgres.exe.
> Then, we need to consider other products than pgpool. Who will
> use the dll? If pgpool is the only user, we might not allow to
> modify core codes only for one usecase. More research other than
> pgpool is required to decide the interface routines for libSQL.

If the user of the new API is only pgpool-II, I hadn't made the
propose in the first place. It's a waste of time and I would rather
keep on borrowing the parse code. I thought there were several people
who needed the API as well in the cluster meeting. If somebody who
made such a vote in the meeting is on the list, please express your
opinion for the API.

I'm not in the position of speaking for other products.
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2010-05-27 03:07:58
Subject: pg_trgm
Previous:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2010-05-27 03:00:56
Subject: Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group